Two Masters (Self or self) 171. Two Masters (Self or self) Two Masters (Self or self)

ONE OR THE “OTHER”

Egolessness Is A Transcendental Spiritual State.

Egolessness Is The (One and Only) Self-Existing, Self-Radiant, Acausal, Nonconditional, Indivisible, Non-“different”, timeless, and spaceless Transcendental Spiritual Self-State of Reality Itself.

Ego-“I” (or egoity itself) is a merely apparent (and, thus, intrinsically illusory and non-necessary, or non-Real) psycho-physical state—conditional, limited, “self”-contracting, “self”-bound, separative, always seeking, never-satisfied, and mortal.

Ego-“I” (both as itself and as all it “knows”) is the individual and universal not-“self”—or the psycho-physical illusion of separateness, relatedness, otherness, “difference”, and space-time-“locatedness” (or “point of view”). Egolessness Is Always Already (or Intrinsically) As Is (or As The “Perfect Knowledge” That Is The Self-State of Reality Itself).

Ego-“I” (and all it “knows”) is always already (or intrinsically) “other” (or not-As-Is, or not The Intrinsically egoless Self-State of Reality Itself). These “two”—The Intrinsically egoless, Self-Existing, and Self-Radiant Self- State of Reality Itself “and” the illusion (and the “knowledge”-illusions) of separate psycho-physical “self”-existence, or ego-“I”, or ego-“self”—are “mutually exclusive”, or intrinsically incompatible with one another.

Choose one, and the other is (thereupon) non-existent.

Choose one.

ALWAYS BE- WHAT IS NOT-“self”( the sensation as a seperate being)

  1. The ego-“I”, or psycho-physically presumed separate and actively separative “self”-identity, is intrinsically “different” from What and all that is egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) as not-“self”. Characteristically, the ego-“I” strategically and “self”-defensively or “self”- protectively clings to the bodily persona and the personal and collectively “tribalized” mind of the conditionally-patterned “self”-identity—and, on that basis, the ego-“I” actively, constantly, and as a psycho-physical totality differentiates itself from What and all that the egoic “self”-identity intrinsically and actively presumes to be not-“self”.

    As a result of all of this ego-based strategizing (in both the personal and the collective domains of life), human beings are caught in a constant “self”-made struggle—always characterized by a fundamental disability, which is the fundamental inability to actively identify with What and all that the egoic “self”-identity identifies (and actively differentiates and “objectifies”) as not-“self”.
     
  2. The What and the all that is egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) as not-“self” always consists of two fundamental modes of not-“self”.

    The first mode of egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) not-“self” Is What Intrinsically Transcends the ego-“I” (or the psychophysically “self”-presumed separate “self”-identity).

    The second mode of egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) not-“self” is all that is egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) as “other” than the ego-“I” (or the psycho-physically-active separative “self”-identity).

171.1

www.guardiantext.org

 PreviousTable of ContentsNext

Home