Two Masters (Self or self) 171. Two Masters (Self or self) Two Masters (Self or self)
  1. The What That Intrinsically Transcends the psycho-physically “self”-presumed separate ego-“I” Is Reality Itself—or The One and Only and Indivisible Self-Nature, Self-Condition, and Self-State of What Is. Reality Itself Is The Universal Transcendental Self-Nature, Self-Condition, and Self-State of all-and-All.

    Reality Itself Is Intrinsically egoless, Indivisible, Acausally and Transcendentally Spiritually Self-Present (both Universally and At The “Root” of all-and-All), and Self-Evidently Divine.

    Reality Itself—or That Which Is (Itself) Divine—Is Transcendentally Spiritually, Universally, Uniformly, Perfectly egolessly, and In-Everywhere-of-space and In-every-mode-and-instant-of-time-and-form-and-person Simultaneously Self- Transmitted and Self-Evidently Self-Revealed As and Via the total cosmic continuum of space-time, which is The conditionally apparent Self-Evidence of Intrinsically Acausal Reality Itself As The Transcendental Spiritual Energy and The Always Prior Unity of Conscious Light.
     
  2. The all that is (apparently) “other” than the psycho-physically actively separative (or psycho-physically actively “self”-differentiating) ego-“I” is all-andevery- one and each-and-all-of-every-“thing” that is identified (or, always mistakenly, “self”-presumed) by the ego-“I” to be “other” than itself.

    Every psycho-physical action (whether of body, emotion, or mind) of ego-“I” and of all-and-every-one and every instant and mode of change of form, or place, or orientation of each-and-all-of-every-“thing” is a happening of conditionally apparent cosmic space-time-energy (or natural and otherwise conditional energy) that is always and inevitably psycho-physically “self”-transmitted into, via, and throughout all time and all space as active “effective causes” and “causative effects”.

    The ego-“I” and all that is “self”-presumed by the ego-“I” to be “other” than the ego-“I” is a seamless pattern of cosmic (or natural and otherwise conditional) energy, always actively functioning as “effective causes” and “causative effects”—and always happening in an always priorly and systematically unified universal cosmic context of conditionally apparent events.
     
  3. The fact and the active “effective causes” and “causative effects” of the separate and separative psycho-physical ego-“I”, or conditionally presumed “self”-identity—and, thus, the totality of the conditionally active “effective causes” and “causative effects” of the “self”-differentiating activities of all human persons, cultures, and societies—is the principal illusion, error, and fault of humankind.

    Therefore, the always principal necessity for humankind is to establish and perpetually enact personal, cultural, and social understanding, means, obligation, and accountability for the personal and the universal collective transcending of the psycho-physical ego-“I”, or the otherwise inevitable universal personal, cultural, and social habit and distress of ego-bound and ego-binding action and system-chaos.
     
  4. The universal personal, cultural, and social means for the transcending of the psycho-physical ego-“I”, or the psycho-physical activity of separate “self”-identification and actively separative “self”-differentiation, is the “self”-discipline of always tacitly and whole-bodily-actively (as a unified psycho-physical totality) identifying with What and all that would otherwise be egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) as not-“self”.
     
  5. The universal personal, cultural, and social “self”-discipline of always tacitly and whole-bodily-actively (as a unified psycho-physical totality) identifying with What and all that would otherwise be egoically identified (and actively differentiated and “objectified”) as not-“self” is intrinsically ecstatic—or a process of always immediately transcending the psycho-physical presumption of separate “self”-identity (or ego-“I”) and the ego-based psycho-physical activity of not- “self”-differentiation and “other-objectifying” separativeness.

171.2

www.guardiantext.org

 PreviousTable of ContentsNext

Home